By Peter Mills MA. PhD. So, it seems we have entered a time when the cause of political Nationalism in Britain lies in tatters, its scattered banners littering the countryside like a defeated army. There are, perhaps, signs that foundations for a rebuilding of a unified Nationalist front are in the process of being laid.
However, it seems to be taking a very long time to get its act together, and time is running out. I would suggest that the best single word to describe the current position of British Nationalism on the political scene is limbo.
This is perhaps well demonstrated by the once-vaunted BNP emblazoning its website on 24th March 2012 with headline news of the glorious and Westminster-shaking achievement in Angmering-on-Sea (out in the sticks somewhere between Worthing and Arundel in Sussex – a modern “Warmington-on-Sea”) where – triumph of triumphs – a BNP parish councilor has been elected.
How have the mighty fallen. If the battle-cry of the British National Party itself has now been reduced to “Yesterday the Nation – Tomorrow the Parish Allotments!” then we must surely be left wondering what future, if any, political nationalism may have in this country.
It has been rightly stated – by Andrew Brons and many others – that there is no point in starting a new Nationalist party. Doing so would only cause yet further division, which is the last thing that is needed. The ideal of Nationalist Unity is a much better aim, but unfortunately perhaps a rather difficult one to accomplish.
In the meantime, British Nationalism exists in an organisational vacuum, where its opponents can trample over it, doing as they please, making laws that undermine our freedom of speech to even discuss vital issues in public, let alone include them in a published political manifesto.
By so doing, the political enemies of Britain are, in effect, able to dictate policy content even to parties which politically oppose them! How’s that for dictatorship?
A political party formed to support the interests of the indigenous people of Britain and which therefore reasonably stipulates that its membership must also be restricted to indigenous British people, or which includes the policy of repatriation of non-indigenous people in its published manifesto, will now face the prospect of prosecution. And the noose is tightening as the clock ticks, with no nationalist opposition being presented across a united broad front.
Having given a great deal of thought to all these various issues confronting and confounding nationalism at this time, it occurs to me that there is, perhaps, one thing we CAN accomplish, without much cross-nationalist disagreement and without (perhaps) transgressing the enemy’s new dictatorial edicts – at least, not too much. We might, however, just manage to bend them a little…
What we can do is to “take a leaf out of a book” that has already been written and achieved its purpose – a book that accomplished what British Nationalism needs to accomplish, but in another country, and for another cause.
“I Have a Dream” said Dr. Martin Luther King as the civil movement for Black Power in the USA began to march towards its eventual successes, a splendid example of an oppressed racial group finding a common voice, its divergent population – notice the important parallel – not uniting to form some new political party, but rather, demanding recognition, equality and the right to speak their own views within the existing major political parties, Republicans and Democrats.
An old saying has it that “what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander”, meaning what applies to one person or one group of people must equally and fairly apply to another.
So let me offer a bold suggestion to all of you who support the general concepts of British Nationalism, regardless of your views, positive or negative, on individual parties or groups, and not interfering with your views on such issues either.
This suggestion has no direct connection with new or old Nationalist political parties or non-party groups. It is not a suggestion to start a new party, or even a new group of any kind. It is a suggestion for ALL Nationalists of ALL parties and groups, or simply fellow believers and sympathisers of no party or group at all.
The beauty of this idea is many-faceted. No leader, chairperson or committee is necessary. There will be no identifiable leader or central office to be targeted by hostile media or hostile laws. No membership fee is required, nor any membership list, and no membership status as such will exist.
Nationalists of all parties and groups can support it if they think it a good idea, and adopt it personally or in larger supporting and action groups as they may wish. And nobody can effectively ban it or legislate against it, or any of the things it stands for and proposes, because it will have no central administration, HQ, address, membership or specific location!
What is this wonderful thing, you may ask? It’s very simple. It is a movement, an idea, a dream to aim for. A people’s movement. Specifically, an indigenous people’s movement. Even more specifically, an indigenous British people’s movement. That’s all.
But before you think “that’s all?” just pause a moment to consider what exactly such a movement ultimately accomplished for the black people of America.
I am old enough to remember the incident in December 1955 when, in Montgomery, Alabama, a black woman named Rosa Parks was ordered by a bus driver to give up her seat to make room for a white passenger, and refused to do so.
This by no means started the Civil Rights Movement, but it was one of the incidents that served to bring it to world-wide attention.
Now in Europe and specifically for us here in Britain, the boot is surely on the other foot. It is the indigenous white people, people of native British white races whether Celtic, Gaelic, Roman, Viking, Cheddar Men, Normans, Flemish Weavers, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Welsh, Cornish… whatever; these are the races who became British and who created Britain.
By right of being here since untold generations ago and making it their land, and shedding their blood, sweat and tears to maintain their presence and security here through all the turbulent ages, these are the Indigenous British People whom present governments deny the legally recognised existence of.
These are collectively the Indigenous British People of the present day, whose right to be here is unquestionable, but whose right to be recognized as an indigenous people – and thereby, share the same legal protections, rights and status as other indigenous people elsewhere in the world – is being actively suppressed by a hostile governmental system which refuses to recognize the status and very existence of the true ancestral indigenous British in today’s society.
Under the present day’s anti-white racist government and racist laws, the indigenous British people are not only denied the rights accorded to other indigenous peoples elsewhere in the world, we are even denied acknowledgement of our very historical, cultural and personal existence.
We are a non-people in our own lands. We are, in fact, being subjected to racial discrimination and even to a process of ethnic cleansing.
This must stop. This must change. This must be contested at street-level and at every opportunity. It is no exaggeration or distortion whatsoever to state that the indigenous white British are today held in an identical position to black Americans before the triumph of the Black Civil Rights movement and the consequent advent of racial equality in their country.
Therefore, I make the following proposal. I make it to all of you – to everyone who may read this and agree, and who wishes to show support for the ideals of Nationalism in Britain, and also to everyone who reads it and wishes to circulate and spread the message to others.
I am not proposing a new party, or any group as such, nor any society, club, or even organization. I am certainly not suggesting that myself or anybody else is “in charge” of it, or even that there is any “head” or “national organizer”.
What I am suggesting is, plainly and simply, that a new CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT should be begun here in Britain, with the purpose of advocating, demanding and pressurizing the authorities for the LEGAL RECOGNITION OF THE EXISTENCE AND RIGHTS OF THE INDIGENOUS WHITE BRITISH.
This needs no central organization or organizer. All it needs is enough people who agree that this is something they can relate to and giver their support to in whatever way may present itself. It will need spokepersons to come forward and give public voice to the movement, but these spokespersons will not be “chiefs” or “chairpersons” or “bosses” except, perhaps, on a very localized and informal level.
Remember, Dr. Martin Luther King was not “Chairman” of the campaign for Civil Rights in the USA; he was a spokesman for its ideals and an inspiration, but once the ball had started rolling, no recognized national leader or chairman was necessary – and as the US government found out to its own great cost, a civil movement with no actual head, director or chairman and with no national infrastructure or head office, is virtually impossible to proscribe, resist or legislate against!
Such a movement would cut across all nationalist political parties. It would be acceptable to all of them, and yet not need to be officially part of their manifestos. It would not be party based.
So, please just let me give a few suggestions here, and these are nothing but basic suggestions – ideas which might (hopefully) be built upon by others.
What I would ask for is the response of others, but not just “armchair comments” criticizing the notion and pooh-poohing it. The kind of response I ask for is the response of addition, of ideas, of ways to make this thing go forward, ways to get it off the ground, things that can be added, things that can be done… ideas and actions that start the ball rolling and make it grow to huge proportions.
I have said, quite rightly, that this movement already exists. All nationalists are already part of it, but until now have perhaps not thought of it in this particular way, that’s all. And a great many ordinary people who are not Nationalists by political conviction are nevertheless very likely to agree in principle with a non-political and peaceful campaigning movement which fights for rights, not votes. (Not every supporter of Black Civil Rights in the USA was black; not everyone who agrees that the white British are being oppressed is a Nationalist. Support for a just cause can come from all directions.)
Let us, then, give it a name. With a name, a belief becomes more solid, more substantial. With a name, a belief becomes more difficult to dismiss, to trample upon, to destroy, to legislate against.
With a name, a feeling becomes an identity! With a name, a feeling becomes an energy – an energy for change, an energy for recognition of white rights!
So, what do you think of a CAMPAIGN FOR WHITE RIGHTS? If you think the idea has merit, all it will take is enterprising and energetic local activists to organize various kinds of peaceful protests that are likely to attract media attention. Peaceful marches, protest groups picketing town halls, even charity work aimed exclusively at aiding white British pensioners and disabled folk.
You don’t need me to paint a picture. There is no copyright on any of this – it is not a political party or a club or association. It is – and needs to be – a street-level movement within society. It will need slogans and banners and some amount of organizing, but there will be no “central office”, no “management”.
Nobody has to ask anyone’s permission to get started on developing the idea in their circle of contacts, in their neighbourhood, in their social networking, their tweets and emails…
It needs to be a People’s Movement which everyone who agrees with its aims can support and give voice to in whatever way they may choose. It needs to spread like brushfire, not like political doctrine or manifesto.
It needs to be a movement towards the full legal recognition of the Indigenous British White People and the successful claiming of our full national and international legal rights to be fully recognized as an indigenous people!
That is the idea and the inspiration. Everything else is up to you. Let us try to build on this, not criticize and dismiss it from our armchairs. Send in your response to this website, and send in your suggestions and ideas for action and for spreading the word, not your list of reasons why it won’t work.
Don’t leave it up to someone else to make things happen – get involved and get enthusiastic. Or, if you prefer, do nothing, scoff at ideas and efforts, and allow the white British race to be effectively extinguished so that it no longer exists – an extinction that has ALREADY been enacted in our own country’s law, which does not recognize the existence of the Indigenous White British People!
Would you rather remain a non-person? If not, take it from here and build on the idea…
3
I believe the white British fulfill the criteria relating to the UN’s official declaration on the rights of indigenous people. That would be a good starting point.
John G, that UN definition is one of the things which needs a tweak. The native British fit its definition in all points except one – which is the government’s legal loophole. According to the UN protocol, no race is entitled to be defined as “indigenous” unless it is also already in a minority within its own ancestral territory. In other words, until this snyde and offensive government “escape clause” is removed from the UN definition, the British people cannot claim to be legally indigenous until they are outnumbered in Britain. This will happen, of course – but once we are in that legal minority situation, it will be too late! We used to call this a “Catch 22” situation.
It would appear that the North West Infidels are leading the way in this regard. But I agree, even more is needed. If the establishment can but maintain the status quo then we are done for and there will be no glorious return for our people. I am certain that there are many ideas floating around in the ether and an even greater number of genuine racial nationalists. What we desperately require is a very large butterfly net.
A brilliant piece, Peter, with an important long-over-due, but previously mooted, message. Thank you.
.
I suggest that the word “White” is taken out of the message and subsequent slogans. The indigenous of these islands are by default White and there is no need to point it out. “White” will simply invite the meaningless, but powerful, cliché of “racism” and hamper the message and its initial stage.
.
A close comparison with other indigenous groups is absolutely essential. I suggest a focus on the Maoris and the fact that they are recognised as “indigenous” even though the general consensus in anthropological academia, and even in the general milieu, is that they have been present in New Zealand for only circa 700 years. (Compare with the Cheddar Man –circa 7150 B.C.– and the weighty irrefutable evidence asserting that our people have been in these islands since the last Ice Age. Above all, expose the injustice and hypocrisy within the Establishment. Don’t provide anything that can be seen as ‘doing down’ other races and peoples, nor provide any indication that this is primarily a “Rightist” agenda and thus exclusive of moderates and “Leftists”. The piece should be transcendental of the class divide and “Left”/”Right” political trajectory. This message can, and must, appeal to all -especially to other races and peoples who share our sense of injustice.
.
I suggest the first step is to construct a video outlining the message and the intellectual apparatus and evidence supporting it. It should be a clear and simple message of Truth and Justice in recognition of our equal rights with other indigenous peoples throughout the world. Try not to get bogged down with statistics, geno-types, and DNA. Sure, mention these but find a comfortable balance between scientific fact and a virtuous cause of defence. This video should then be on Youtube and all other sites stocking videos, and most importantly is should be on the website of each and every nationalists and patriotic group, thus showing our common cause.
.
Regarding the name and slogans, I suggest (by at this stage initial whim and gut conviction): “Justice for the Natives -Recognise Us Too!”; “Stop Injustice against the Indigenous -Rights and Recognition for the Native British”.
.
Why not send a deputation to the U.N. with a portfolio of hard, irrefutable evidence. Prior to such an undertaking issue a mass press release and especially contact Russia Today who will, I am certain, gladly film and document the event for their new site.
.
These are just my initial thoughts for now. I’ll develop the points as this undertaking gains some momentum. If you want to contact me, Peter, I give permission for the admin of this site to forward to you my email address. I am willing to work on this venture.
.
_____________________
As an aside, can we please also desist in using politically “correct” labels such as “chairperson”, “chair”, etc. This may seem a minor point to some; but apart from it being infantile, the purpose of political “correctness” is one of social control and the subsequent power within discourse for the benefit of the Liberal/Left. We need to counter this inversion at every opportunity, starting with simply not adhering to it. Of course, most people would not listen to their “Walkperson” (Walkman) and they would avoid man-holes and not “person-holes”. Also, “racism” is an ideological concept and as a concept it should always be used in quotation marks. I do not recognise this term, any more than I recognise “regionalism” or “sizeism”, for example.
R.L.
A movement is already here, not party based that meets 99% of your aims.
BRITAIN FIRST is it not time you rallied around the flag?
A civil rights movement for the native British, if it exists, shall need to be run by educated people, mostly scientists, or people who know what they are talking about. Britain First is not run by anyone remotely intelligent. I mean Jim Dowson on GA’s website has revealed he doesn’t believe in evolution, and that he thinks Humans were created ex nihilo supernaturally by the Judeo-Christian ”God”… need i say more.
Jim Dowson has absolutely zero nationalist credentials when compared to others within the movement. In fact, I doubt if anyone would trust him. Mr Brons has many years of fighting and has European experience and presumably, contacts. Unfortunately Mr Dowson was involved in the destruction of the BNP along with Griffin. He has a sectarian bias which cannot be brought into the Nationalist cause.
An excellent suggestion and one of the utmost relevance to recent events I feel. It has been my conclusion for some weeks that for the moment, party politics is irrelevant to the survival of the White peoples.
I would suggest as a name, ‘The indigenous rights movement’ or something similar. ‘White Rights’ seems a little reactionary to me, I think we need soemthing new and different. May I suggest participation in white cultural events and eventually organising them.
There are rumours that the old Heathen front will be revived shortly with a similar intention. I think most certainly our immediate fight should be one on the issue of our demographic decline and should be one that is not a top down structure, we should encourage people from all walks of life, whether British, French, African or Indian to take a stand against this human injustice. We may even be able to take a few liberal noses out of the sand to realise that the decline of the white people is not something one can afford to ignore.
“Indigenous” is a good word to use,as the MSM have used it in a positive way,everyone likes indigenous people.We should emphasise that we want actual equality,not just theoretical equality.So if there is Black Police Officers Association,we want a White Police Officers Association-this might involve legal action against Police Forces.If there is “The Voice” newspaper for black people in a large newsagent chain,we want a newspaper for white people in that same chain.If other ethnic groups are allowed to have charities,social clubs,old peoples homes,we should get the same.This would probably require an organised group, with funding for legal actions.One small step might be an online petition,worded so that no one could possibly object to it,like the “No to Seventy Million” petition.
Firstly, thank you for your efforts to save the indigenous people. What a brilliant idea. This will certainly sort the wheat from the chaff! Any so called Nationalist who opposes this idea MUST be a collaborator or infiltrator.
If this doesn’t bring us all together to save our children and grandchildren, nothing will, we may as well lie down and send a donation to the Liebour party and get it over with quickly instead of prolonging the agony.
I hear a lot of talk gentlemen but no actions. All sauce and no substance.
The clock is ticking towards the next general election. If we are to mount a unified action then may i suggest we start ASAP, because before you know it time will have run out and it will become one botched affair. Another poor example of how not to run an election campaign.
Here in Hull i have already brought the BNP, NF,EDL and other nationalists around the same table to organise joint days of action as United Nationalists.
All it took was a couple of phone calls !
This seems like a great idea. Of course there are already several movements out there already in action. Let’s have as many as possible. A many headed beast, so to speak, is harder to kill than just one. We need to bring a sort of ‘hornets’ nest’ around the establishments’ ears.
Of course the difference between B.First & this suggestion, is the membership fee. For those of us who have already been fleeced by that crook Griffin, this would be more attractive.
Good idea. This will attract all people who believe in preserving national identity whether they want to get involved in a political party or not.
It is a good solution to the disunity and also is much harder for the establishment to attack.
We can still belong to political parties if we wish and work together in parallel.
Forgive me for being the devil’s advocate.
But I have certain issues with this post,
A, Why is it that almost every post on this, supposed nationalist unity forum, starts with a dig at the BNP. Factually and geographically wrong I might add.
B, As has already been expressed, in this post. Under current UN charter, we will have to open the gates to our country even wider, so we truly become a minority, before we can act on this proposal, Or is this what the author of this post intends, so we can act as one.(maybe my definition is wrong, please correct me).
In response to Martin’s posting, one of my intentions was to plant a seed in the minds of all nationalists who read the article so that a “White Rights” (or “Indigenous Rights”) movement would start to grow and spread WITHOUT the need of a “chairman”, or any national central admin. It would hopefully just be a motivational driving-force amongst all the population who have similar beliefs. Local activists would arrange demonstrations, marches – everything the Equal Rights movement did in the USA in the 1960s. Secondly, if the BNP wishes to avoid digs, they should throw away their shovels (especially chief gravedigger Griffin). Regarding the United Nations definition of “indigenous people”, the clause requiring a native population to be in a minority in its own homeland before it is entitled to be legally pronounced an Indegenous People is – obviously – a very unfair, corrosive and politically motivated clause which should be THE major target of the present time for ALL nationalists and for everyone who isn’t a nationalist but who supports the idea of freedom and removal of political suppression. This clause needs to be removed as a matter of immediate priority – yet, when did any nationalist orgainsation or party star up a petition to try to get the ball rolling? Handing in a petition to the UN might not produce an immediate result, but if there were enough signatures it would at least let them know people were concerned about this particular issue.
Petitions are for those who do not truly appreciate their predicament or influential special interest groups.
Let’s face it, we are the enemies of the establishment and vice versa and, following the Nuremburg trials, we cannot expect either justice nor candour. We are a beaten people and we currently have no champions. We must therefore become the manifestation of our own salvation and discard the premise that this is battle on a level playing field.
We speak of reason and justice while our enemies enforce policies that can only result in our complete eradication; like a potential victim attempts to reason with the veteran psychopathic killer.
We must fully understand our environment before we can take our first faltering steps toward emancipation. Our enemies have all the avenues covered so we must therefore employ a rotary hammer and develop new escape routes.
Apologies for the over use of metaphor, but I did not want to ramble on.
Actually, the United Nations organisation is in collusion with the Marxist Liberal/Zionist alliance to prevent at all costs, any recognition or attempts thereat of indigenous status in ALL White ancestral homelands.
It is as we know, overrun by non-White countries almost entirely and it should be obvious to one and all that any petition(s) to reverse that malicious clause about indigenous peoples having to be reduced to minority status in their own homelands(s) to be recognised as indigenous at all, applies to White nations alone and shall never be cancelled as long as the aforementioned alien races and tribes are running the show.
The non-White world has been beavering away for decades with the help of the Ashkenazim and indigenous White self-hating Marxist Liberal traitors, to destroy the White world so as a result one of the first steps we must take is to commence campaigning for the withdrawal of White native homelands from that criminal organisation and set about forming an alternative united nations catering for White nations only.
I think you’re right. In fact, I’m beginning to believe that ‘withdrawal’ and separating ourselves in many different ways is the only path forward. Refuse to play a game where your opponents hold all the cards. It’s pointless because you can never win. Can anyone seriously see Britain ever getting rid of the influence of the left when they have almost total control. They have millions of imported supporters, and lots more available. We lost the chance to turn the tide when Blair was elected. Now, I believe new tactics are needed, and more contact with other like minded Europeans to trade ideas.
great idea. hadn’t a clue indigenous people were not regarded as such until they were a minority! stable door, anyone?
national geographic had a piece a while back stating that 80% of british people have dna going back to the first people here at the end of the last ice age, and that the most obvious genetic marker was red hair. quite a lot of us!
We are all missing the point due to many years of Nationalism being painted as racist we fight an uphill battle.In my own little corner of England Swale council/KCC operate a policy of discrimination against nationalists at all levels.I fight my corner at every opportunity and I need all of you to write/email Geoff Wild at KCC and tell him we live in a free society and the creeping orwellion state in the UK is not acceptable.
I need as many people as possible to complain to the monitoring officer about Mark Baldock,Ex Labour lefty now UKIP calling me a racist
If we nationalists unite we can both defeat them all and we’ll be stronger for working together.
Hey there! I’ve been reading your site for some time now and finally got the bravery to go ahead
and give you a shout out from Houston Tx! Just wanted to mention keep up the great job!
(Party Member) How wonderful to hear from Houston in Texas. We are all aware of your horrific border problems with even unaccompanied children appearing in the states.