The Mystery of the Chairman Who Did Not Speak
This was not ‘just another debate’. For Nationalists, this the was the most important debate of the year – perhaps of the Parliament. It was a debate about how to make it easier to send Nationalists to prison for talking or writing about the presence of immigrants.
Whilst we could not change the outcome of the vote – that has yet to come – we could rehearse the arguments and put our opponents on the back foot.
This was an occasion on which all Nationalists should have been present. They could have asked for Catch the Eye speeches and asked Blue Card questions. However, I was the only Nationalists present from Britain. The other British ‘Nationalist’ was too busy to attend.
Andrew Brons asked one Blue Card question and tried to ask four more but these were not allowed. He asked to make a Catch the Eye speech. However, when it came to the Catch the Eye section, it was announced that those who had asked Blue Card questions would not be selected to give Catch the Eye speeches – a previously unknown rule invented for the occasion!
3
Oh come on Mr B – I expect he who cannot be named had other priorities, maybe chasing up legacies, banking dosh or writing fresh donate appeals. Whats more important – standing up for Britain or screwing more money out of the gullible??? You forget it costs money to retire in style to a villa in the Med these days – even Croatia aint as cheap as it used to be!!!!! Whats more he who cannot be named will be out of a job next year and needs every penny he can lay his mits on if the stories are true!!!
We need to Unite and work together, just like different units of the armed forces do.
Unity is a two way street. I havent seen any signs of olive branches being waived by Griffin’s lot, quite the reverse in fact.