An open challenge to the editors of the Sun and the Daily Mail: In the light of your exposure of the slum into which Southall has been turned by nonwhite immigration, will you now finally admit the truth about race and the colonisation of Britain?
In an article which would not have been out of place on this website, the Sun and the Daily Mail today published articles entitled “Slumdogs of Southall” and “Welcome to the Slums of Southall: How unscrupulous landlords have illegally built squalid homes for immigrants.”
Accompanied by some dramatic photographs which illustrate the extent of the nonwhite colonisation of London, the papers announced that there were now so many illegal immigrants living in Southall that it had become a like a Third World slum.
However, the Sun and the Daily Mail deliberately avoided pointing out the real issue, and instead insisted it was the result of “unscrupulous landlords” who have “illegally built squalid homes for immigrants.”
The Daily Mail said that “rats and cockroaches roam in [the] hidden world” and that “planning rules are clearly flouted as council claims it is a growing problem across London.”
An aerial photograph shows that almost ever house in the heavily Asian colonised area had shacks in their back garden which housed anywhere between one and six illegal immigrants—with mose appearing to come directly from India.
One of the illegal immigrants, Sukhvinder Singh, when interviewed by the Sun, said he was “originally from the Punjab in northern India. He now shares a shed with three others for £500 a month in Southall Green.
He told the Sun that the arrived in Britain on a “student visa” but that he was actually here “to work. If I wanted to study I could have stayed in India.” The papers claimed there are 10,000 similar shacks in London.
Both papers then tried to blame lax law enforcement for the problem. This is, of course, true only to a certain extent.
The forces of political correctness have so terrorised the law enforcement agencies that they are often too scared to intervene for fear of being called “racist.”
But it is not the whole story. At the heart of the problem lies the fundamental fact that Britain is steadily being colonised by the Third World, with the active connivance and support of the Conservative, Liberal Democrat and Labour parties.
The appearance of slums is not merely a result of “immigration.” It is the result of Third World immigration.
The slums in Southall—and in many other parts of London, Birmingham, Manchester and other colonised parts of Britain—are the direct result of a mass influx of Third World immigrants. There is no getting around this fact.
A culture, which includes all aspects of a society’s make-up, including its environment, technological level, living standard, educational level and all other social manifestations, is merely a reflection of the people living in that society.
The Chinese people will produce a society which reflects their values, norms and standards. The Japanese people will produce a society which reflects their values, norms and standards. European people will produce a society which reflects their values, norms and standards. African people will produce a society which reflects their values, norms and standards, and Indian people will produce a society which reflects their values, norms and standards.
This fact is not “racist” — it is simple commonsense.
It is therefore logical that if a society which has been made by Chinese people is subjected to mass immigration by Indian people, the nature of that society will change to reflect the new inhabitants.
This is, once again, simple commonsense.
As a result, in a place like Southall, as the Sun and the Daily Mail have now revealed, the prevailing culture is now from the Indian subcontinent.
What has happened in Southall is not per se a problem with “lack of law enforcement,” “unscrupulous landlords” or the other excuses which the editors of the Sun and the Daily Mail have invtnted.
The real issue is that the native, indigenous, white British people have been ethnically cleansed from Southall by mass Third World, nonwhite immigration.
As a result, the prevailing culture in the area is now a reflection of the fact that the majority of its inhabitants are now from the Third World.
This is the fact which the Sun and Daily Mail refuse to admit.
And it is the critical fact which threatens the future of Britain.
A continued failure to address the truth about race and immigration will see the “slumdogs of Southall” extend to the entire country, and ultimately, lead to the extinction of the British nation and people.
Will the editors at the Sun and the Daily Mail ever admit the truth?
Recommended reading: Folk and Nation – Underpinning the Ethnostate (THIRD EXPANDED EDITION April 2011)
By Arthur Kemp B.A. (Pub. Admin., Pol. Sci., Int. Pol.). First published in 2008 with a second edition in 2009, this third edition explains in detail the concept of ethno-nationalism. It also contains six new chapters dealing with the thorny issues of mass immigration into Britain and an important discussion on the fallacy of the “multiculturalism has failed” argument.
With regard to the latter, the author points out that it is not “multiculturalism” per se which has failed, but rather the policy of mass immigration, of which “multiculturalism” is but one symptom.
The book contains the previously availale text: Ethnic Nationalism – A Definition; Central Tenets of Ethno-Nationalism; Underlying Concepts of Ethno-Nationalism; The Implications of Ethno-Nationalism; The Practical Application of Ethno-Nationalism; Attacks on Ethno-Nationalism; and How to Argue the Case for Ethno-Nationalism.
It provides all the answers underpinning the non-racist argument for Britain to remain a British country–arguments which can be used for any nation, anywhere. Invaluable for anyone wishing to understand modern democratic nationalist ideology.
In addition, the six new chapter headings are:
– The Colonisation of Britain: White British School Pupils Set to be Minority by 2021.
– Invasion: Immigration Wave Means 650 New UK Citizens Every Day.
– German Chancellor’s “Multiculturalism Has Failed” Remarks Highlight Danger of “Adapt or Integrate” Mentality.
– The Colonisation of Britain: Bradford CoE in Crisis as Muslim Population Skyrockets.
– Study Which Claims “5.5 Million Muslims in 20 years” in Britain Is a Gross Underestimate.
– Is it Multiculturalism Which Has Failed?
– Cockneys: The First British Group to be Ethnically Cleansed.
P/B 41 pp. £7.80 Click here to purchase online.
The aerial photo also shows numerous extensions on extensions at the back of houses. These will almost certainly be illegal too. “Permitted development”, which does not require planning permission, was introduced by Michael Hestltine in 1984 allows an absurd 50% of gardens to be covered with buildings “… incidental to the enjoyment of the dwelling house”. This does not include habitable accommodation, but as the article says, without a right of immediate access how can inspectors prove that they are not being used as dwellings? No doubt planning enforcement officers would be wary of demanding entry and enforcing demolition of these structures anyway for fear of being accused of racist – and in so doing loosing their job and pension.
Added to the hideous box-like rear and side dormers that are also allowed, these regulations are long overdue for revision to remove these undesirable features.
The other thing that needs changing is the planning rule that deems illegal development to be legal after 4 years. In my view it should NEVER be deemed legal.
Peter Phillips – Architect
There are none so blind as those who are PC. (sic)
How can the establishment admit they were wrong about mass immigration and the media and press are the establishments voice, so silence will reign supreme on the subject.
To admit they are wrong is to then have to tackle the issue, They have neither the will nor the imagination to even begin this process.
In comparison to this option, burying your head in the sand makes perfect sense.
It rests with us to tell the truth, the main stream media and press are part of the problem therefore can never be part of the solution to it.
I have no doubt that once upon a time, perhaps as recently as forty or fifty years ago, these were pretty back gardens with flowers, fruit trees and vegetable plots. That was the environment created between the wars in a great band right around London, and every other city, as English people moved out of crowded and insanitary tenements to the near countryside of the new suburbs – an agreeable environment created by English people for English people and exactly reflecting our culture and way of life.
These can be pretty back gardens again, what has been turned upside down can be righted, if we have the will and the drive to take our country back.
There seems to be no end to this process of colonisation.
.
Let us remember though, that this situation of sheds and fabricated buildings is not new – it has been going on for around a decade and I think it was even briefly covered on BBC Panorama – Immigration-“How We Lost Count” a few years ago. (Which is a program every nationalist and potential nationalist should have seen in order to ram home the pace and scale of what’s going on).
.
Nothing is really done about it, it seems. However, in contrast, remember the hullabaloo just a month or so ago over some (white British) trainee nurse (or whatever it was) and her fiance who were saving for a house and living in the parents’ back garden in a converted shed/cabin? The authorities soon seemed to be crawling over that one when they got wind of it. Easy pickings, no doubt.
One ‘law’ for them, a different law for us. Is this cohesion and equality? Of course not; but we do not hear Jonathan Bartley of Ecclessia complaining.
May I make the following point, which I have often made: Racism is not what we have been told.
Racism is not where you want to keep your country.
Racism is where someone else wants to take it from you.
I am disgusted that our once great nation is being colonised into a third world hell hole. Never mind which generation is to blame. The fact remains we have to do something ASAP
And strangely The Mail will not print any comment they deem “politically incorrect”.
And this from a supposed Right Wing publication.
You’re better to read the Daily Express. They may promote UKIP, but beggars.. etc…
BA,
Here it is:
http://watchdocumentary.com/watch/immigration-how-we-lost-count-video_5392853d5.html
The road to Gundegai British version 2020…
‘There’s a shack out the back by the winding Southall track along the road to Londistan’