By Mark Pritchard. The BBC has broadcast further evidence of the way in which immigrant communities exploit Britain’s lax immigration laws to boost their numbers and maintain an alien way of life that breeds Islamic terrorism.
“My Forced Unwanted Wedding”, broadcast on 19th September, focussed on a typical case, in which Bangladeshis used the fact that anyone born in Britain is automatically a British citizen with the right to live and work here, a right which they can then confer on anyone they marry.
When combined with their custom of forcing their children into arranged marriages against their will, this makes Bangladeshi girls born in Britain a valuable commodity to their families.
The more so when the girls are then sent home as babies to be raised in remote villages without any education, so they will grow up imbued with the most backward and obscurantist peasant Islamism.
This they will in turn pass on to their children raised in Britain. Thus generation after generation grows up physically in Britain but mentally in the mediaeval rustic backwaters of Bangladesh, or indeed, for the custom is the same there, Pakistan.
Hence the ongoing supply of third-generation British-born Immigrants willing to take up arms, or blow themselves up, to strike at our country whose passports they bear.
The BBC highlighted the typical case of “Jessie”, a Bangladeshi teenager. Although born here, and hence possessed of the all-important British passport, she had spent just 11 months of her 17 years in our country and could speak only a few words of English.
Shortly after her birth in Britain as the youngest of seven children, her parents shipped her back to a village in Sylhet, the remote and backward province from which most Bangladeshis in Britain come. There she was raised by her kin as a good Muslim peasant girl, unable to read and write and indoctrinated with their peasant superstitions and customs.
At the age of 11 a marriage was arranged by her family to an older Bangladeshi citizen, a cousin 22 years her senior. Any children born to such close relatives carry a much enhanced risk of being born deformed.
Indeed the incidence of such deformities, and consequent cost to the NHS of treatment, is much higher amongst Pakistani and Bangladeshi Immigrant communities in Britain amongst whom this almost incestuous, but technically legal, custom is prevalent.
Once this lucrative wedding deal had been arranged by her family, “Jessie” was increasingly kept as a prisoner in her family’s hut, her valuable British passport taken by her father “for safe keeping”.
However as her 18th birthday, and marriage to a 40-year-old man she hardly knew loomed, she managed to phone the British Consulate in Dacca whilst her father was at evening prayers and beg for help. She was lucky – the British Consulate, aided by the BBC and an armed escort, intervened to rescue her.
Of course, she ended up back in Britain, a country of which she knew nothing and whose language she could not speak, because of the British passport that got her into all this trouble in the first place.
Now she lives here at British taxpayers’ expense. Having become financially worthless to them, her large family in Britain will have nothing to do with her, claiming that by declining to be sold into sex slavery she has “dishonoured” them.
Although she knew once her new husband had got a work visa, and then a British passport, out of her she would probably have been dumped anyway.
As “Jessie” said to the BBC: “My cousin didn’t want me, he just wanted a passport. Lots of Bangladeshi girls have to do that, we have to marry our cousins, bring them to this country, and then get divorced because we don’t know each other well.”
It is indeed a widespread practice. Alan Morrison, British Consul to Bangladesh, told the BBC: “In these circumstances, when you’ve got a British girl, often she’s seen as a commodity. Because she’s got a passport, he can get a visa, and work in the UK. We’re seeing a generational strategy to emigrate to the UK.”
There are an estimated 40,000 British passport holders in Bangladesh’s Sylhet province alone. Many of them are girls like Jessie, bred and being raised simply to be sold to other Bangladeshis as brides so that – thanks to our loose Immigration laws – they can get into Britain.
If we tightened up our citizenship and Immigration laws, so that British citizenship was a matter of blood and heritage rather than accident of birth, and the right to live and work here was not conferred on adults by a ten minute ceremony in a registry office, tragic stories such as “Jessies” would be a thing of the past.
For our Immigration laws do not just afflict the native population with an apparently endless inflow of alien settlers colonising our only homeland. They also, as the BBC have showed, inflict suffering on members of the Immigrant community themselves. Not just on those sold like slaves into arranged marriages with their close relatives. But on the tragically deformed children such unsavoury couplings so often bring forth.
The BBC have performed a public service in broadcasting this tale from the sordid underbelly of our multiracial society.
Of course, it would have been a greater service had they broadcast it on a channel such as BBC1or 2 many people actually watched, instead of the obscure cable BBC3. But they have broadcast it nonetheless, and shamed the system. They will not care. But the British people will. If we make sure they hear about it.
2
This is modern-day slavery and should shame the Liberal-Left lunatics and traitors who have encouraged this despicable trade to happen.
Primary Purpose rule was used to stop this, and needs re-instating. The scumbag Jack Straw I remember saying it’s repeal would not see a noticeable increase in these forced marriages, well we all know now Straw and the rest of the labour traitors would do anything, (even if it meant poor Bangladeshi/Pakistani girls being treated in such an abominable manner), to impose their mad multicultural and multiracial nightmare on to theclong-suffering British people.