Mandela. As the Vultures Gather

by Tim Haydon.

The vultures are hovering around the death-bed of saint-in –waiting Nelson Mandela.  TV Reporters have been sent to South Africa to be in at the death.  ITN’s Mark Austin  has been reverentially interviewing Mandela’s ex –wife Winnie, who gave her backing to the horrendous ‘necklace ‘ murders.   Amidst  all the adulation now and to come, it’s easy to forget precisely why all this attention is being given to Mandela  by the left-liberal media.

Nelson Mandela is not an ‘anti-racist’ as he is held up to be by the white, self-hating left-liberals. He is a black racist and nationalist. He fought, not for majority rule, but for black majority rule.  He said this plainly enough in his speech to the court during the Rivonia trial:-

‘I have done whatever I did, both as an individual and as a leader of my people……………. and my own proudly felt African background…’

Saint Mandela was prepared to use violence ‘as a result of a calm and sober assessment of the political situation that had arisen after many years of tyranny, exploitation, and oppression of my people by the Whites’.

The left-liberal media slaver over Mandela because he is black and because he is anti-white. If he were a white British nationalist who had fought for white majority rule and the ethnic interests of the native Brits in the face of mass ethnic immigration engineered by their own oppressing political class, perhaps letting off bombs in crowded public  areas to pursue this agenda as did Mandela, would they do the same? The idea is laughable.  He would be described as an ‘extremist’, a fascist and even a ’nazi’.  Left –liberals, blinded by sentimental and patronising ideological attitudes have got Mandela all wrong because he is black, just as they got Ghandi all wrong.

White South Africans brought in Apartheid essentially because they did not think that the majority black population was capable of running South  Africa in a civilised and efficient manner in which they as the group which had built the country from nothing would get a fair crack of the whip. They were right in this assessment.

South Africa has been doing well economically but that is because its primary strengths lie in the production of raw materials. The demand for these from China especially has been quite enormous until very recently. But as the Chinese economy hits the buffers, this is likely to be reversed. At the same time, infrastructure has been allowed to run down, we have all seen graphic depictions of the decline of once proud and efficiently run cities like Johnnesburg into crime –ridden slums, and the political system is ridden with corruption, cronyism and inefficiency.

The whites who ran South Africa have been fleeing the country in their millions They take with them  their high average IQ levels. Here is Richard Lynn:

‘’The IQs of European students in South Africa are in the range 100-105 (ie about the same as European students in other countries) …typical African students who have had some 12 years of school and have gained entrance to university obtain IQs in the range 72-84. Since these are an  African cognitive elite, these results suggest that the IQ of about 70 for the general population is valid and about right.’(Lynn,  ‘Race Differences in Intelligence’ pp38, 39 Washington Summit 2006)

Of course, there are intelligent and successful black South Africans. There are just a lot fewer of them as a percentage of the total population than there are among Europeans. The black South African population has a mean IQ level which in this country could be classified as ‘borderline’ mental functioning – just above mild retardation.   The idea that a population like this could successfully sustain an advanced society is ridiculous.

The harsh truth is that the White South African apartheid  generation with its intimate knowledge of Black Africa  knew this.  Soppy left–liberals  in the far-away, comfortable West refuse to admit it. But perhaps the Chinese will fill the  IQ vacuum as they are doing elsewhere in Africa.