A New Look at March of the Titans by Arthur Kemp (2013).
A review by Andrew Brons. I am not easily lured into unjustified superlatives but this might be one of most important books ever written. It is also, just possibly, one of the most depressing.
I remember Arthur giving a talk on press publicity to some of my MEP staff. He said that a clear outline of the story contained in a press statement should appear in the first paragraph.
He followed his own prescription, with the necessary changes, in his book. A clear outline of the book is contained in the eleven pages of its Prologue and in the page and a half of the postscript.
That does not mean that you can skip pages 12-662 though I am sure that some will. They contain the evidence that supports his conclusions. I can assure you that I did read them but please do not devise a test for me. Newly acquired information is not so easily retained in the elderly. I shall probably need to read the whole book a second time.
Some might accuse him of using the term civilization rather too liberally and widely. He asked what would happen if the Australian Aborigine population were to replace the Chinese population and concluded that China would have an Aborigine civilization. Erm, yes.
Indeed he avoids at all costs making judgments of some civilizations as being superior or inferior when compared with others. However, the reader is not prohibited from making such judgments.
Civilizations are the product of the particular races that created them. Change the race and you will change the civilization. He avoids using the word ‘fall’ of civilizations and prefers the word ‘replacement’. That might be a sign of his objectivity or simply his kindness.
He examines the rise and fall—sorry, replacement—of civilizations in India, Central Asia, Sumeria and Egypt and then continues to look at Greece and Rome.
He ridicules all of the elaborate social, political, economic and environmental explanations for their fall—sorry, replacement. A society or civilization is only a reflection of the population of its territory.
“If the society that has produced a particular civilization stays intact as a racially homogeneous unit, then that civilization remains active. If, however, the society within any given area changes its racial makeup—through invasion, immigration, or any decline in numbers—then the civilization that that society has produced will disappear with them, to be replaced by a new civilization reflecting the new inhabitants of that territory”.
“Originally created by Proto-Nordics, Alpines and Mediterraneans and then influenced by waves of Indo-European invaders, the white civilizations of the Middle East flourished, producing the wonders of the ancient world.
“These regions were either invaded or otherwise occupied (through the use of labourers, immigration or, in rare cases by conquest) by non-white nations of varying races. When the original white peoples who created those civilizations vanished or became an insignificant minority (through death and absorption into other races) their civilizations ‘fell’ in exactly the same way as the Amerind civilization in North America ‘fell’.”
Arthur Kemp concludes with these telling words:
“When the white civilizations of the ancient world were overrun, there were always new territories and new lands to be opened. When Mesopotamia fell, Egypt arose. When Egypt fell, classical Greece arose. When classical Greece fell, Rome arose. When Rome fell, the European states arose. The New World was opened and North America, Australia and New Zealand were added as white heartlands.
“Now however, these are all threatened by mass Third World immigration. There are no more new territories or lands to be opened. It is the final call for white Western civilization.”
March of the Titans is available here:
March of the Titans: The Complete History of the White Race: Volume I: The Rise of Europe (£9.25)
and
March of the Titans: The Complete History of the White Race: Volume II: Europe and the World (£8.61)
Views Today : 2338
Who's Online : 9
11
Our vibrant multicultural cities are symptoms of a dying civilization. According to another article on this site on Mancur Olson and the decline of nations the people whose civilization is dying won’t mobilise until they themselves become a minority in around 2060. At which point it will be too late as the entire country will have become part of the Third World.
That’s too pessimistic Chris.
What Olson was saying is that action requires incentives. Being in a terrible situation is insufficient. You would think it sufficient at first sight but in fact there is little incentive for individuals to be first to take on the whole system. They have too much to lose compared with the gains which will go almost entirely to others. Why be a human sacrifice?
But things are changing and we’ll soon likely be at the point when much of the disincentive in the form of social rejection and infamy if you dare to confront the established ideology will have evaporated. The balance of incentive and disincentive is altering.
The left are helping this along by employing their standard unimaginative methods against UKIP. ‘Nazi scum’ and so on becomes a parody after a while and it loses its deterrent effect.
(Party Member) We predicted on this site that 2014 would be Nationalism’s year. All the signs that times are changing are there with people questioning the attacks on our Christian values, our membership of the E.U. Superstate, mass immigration and indeed the liberal type lack of values that has seen our society virtually disintegrate. Help the great British revival and join the British Democratic Party today.
I take your point Mike, but at the expense of sounding cautious, if not pessimistic, British Nationalism has been characterized by a series of ‘tide about to turn’ moments. With the wreck of the hope that was the BNP, UKIP is now in the ascendant. To many nationalists, however, UKIP is raising more of a white flag than its head above the parapet. Nevertheless the left still subjects UKIP, being the only visible opposition, to the standard savaging. Surely this unimaginative approach is one of the left’s strengths? Rather than wearing thin, as one would have thought, this type of ‘criticism’ has the effect of making any opponent look like a pariah.
It’s utterly depressing to see a nationalist movement which was rapidly growing destroyed by one man. And even more depressing when the movement which replaced it finds it necessary to demonise us in the vain hope of avoiding demonisation themselves.
But whatever our personal discomfiture, there is no doubt that UKIP represents a break out from the thought controllers on a scale not yet seen. There is also a growing and thriving alternative media not behind a pay wall.
What really counts in politics in the end is what people think. And the attempts to corral people into a version of reality at odds with what they can see around them are beginning to break down.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/05/16/tory-party-leaflet-east-london
And this is the ruling ‘conservative’ party! Talk about chameleons. Won’t do them any good though.
And then they wonder why increasingly large numbers of white people (their ELECTORAL BASE) want nothing to do with them and this isn’t just restricted to people who are not very affluent.
Seriously, do they REALLY think muslims as a group are EVER going to vote Tory in anything but miniscule numbers? If they do they fully deserve their title of being ‘Britain’s stupid party’. Labour, Lib Dem, Green ect can pander much more effectively and be believed than the Tories can do it so why bother?
A far more effective vote-winning strategy for the Tories would be SERIOUSLY cracking-down upon immigration and therefore NOT allowing in people who not likely to vote for them!