John Bean’s Nationalist Notebook No.6

The Right and the Left are blinkered to Islamic Fundamentalist Extremism.

The murder by partial beheading of the British soldier Lee Rigby is possibly the high water mark of Islamic extremism in Britain. I say ‘possibly’ because I cannot decide whether the frequency of the organised rape of our young girls by Muslim gangs is more deserving of  this award for defilement of our nation. Yet there are still some amongst the radical right, even so-called nationalists, who believe that it is all either exaggeration or our ‘just  reward’ for not supporting the Arab nations over Israel. If it was confined to criticising our stupidity in following the Bush-Blair baseless attack upon Iraq and then the embroilment in Afghanistan, then they would certainly have a valid point.

Let us face a hidden truth. The UK’s nationalist camp  can well do without the mainly secret Hitler worshippers who will forgive all Islamist transgressions in our midst because, for example, back in the forties some European Moslems in Montenegro fought for the Fuhrer  because they did not like Jews. One can respect certain members of the National Front and bodies such as Stormfront who are openly Nazis. They have made a choice, even if they avoid admitting whether or not they approve of the killing of one to six million  Jews in WW2 – the true figure will probably never be known. The people we should avoid are those armchair ‘Nazi warriors’ who give themselves fantasy militant titles, as they conduct their imaginary campaigns through Facebook or the like. The old adage of “they could not fight their way out of a paper bag “often comes to mind.

If the so-called ‘far’right has its problems with those who would tolerate Islamic fundamentalist extremism, then so has the far left. This was the basis of an informative article in The Independent , 28.6.13 by James Bloodworth.

He believes that within the militant left there is now an anti-war movement working enthusiastically with those advocating the murder of homosexuals, a left-wing former Mayor of London embracing a man who said Hitler had been sent by Allah to punish the Jews, and a group set up ostensibly to oppose fascism warmly welcoming religious fascists (Islamic Fundamentalists) into its own ranks.

The group that Bloodworth had in mind is Unite Against Fascism. Launched in 2003 to combat the BNP, it is now more concerned in trying to attack the English Defence League as the BNP becomes more inept.

He believes that UAF’s definition of what constitutes fascism is a peculiar one. “Not only are those advocating the resurrection  of a fascistic Islamic caliphate seemingly not worth opposing, they have been actively welcomed into the UAF fold by the leadership.”

The article says that one of UAF’s vice-chairs is Azad Ali, affairs co-ordinator for the Islamic Forum of Europe, an offshoot of the far-right Islamist group Jamaat-e-Islami. Azad Ali approvingly quoted an Islamist militant on his website in 2008 who claimed it was a religious obligation to kill British and American soldiers.

This passage in The Independent’s article is interesting: “As Maryam Namazie of One Law for All puts it: ‘the likes of the Stop the War Coalition, the Socialist Workers Party, Unite Against Fascism, Islamophobia Watch, and the Respect Party… are there as prefects to silence dissenters and defend Islamism as a defence of Muslim’”.

James Bloodworth should have pointed out the role of Channel 4 TV  in his article.  Whilst we are as guilty as most in hammering away at the BBC for its left-wing slant, Channel 4 has made it an art form in its news and socio-political programmes. During Ramadan this month  it will  be broadcasting the Islamic call to prayer (the adhan) every morning.

Ralph Lee, the head of factual programming, said: “ Observing the adhan on Channel 4 will act as a nationwide tannoy system, a deliberate ‘provocation’ to all our viewers in the very real sense of the word.”

Hopefully, Mr Lee may find out one day what sort of ‘provocation’ he can suffer in a nationalist court.

A Million Pupils do not Speak English

Meanwhile the effects of mass immigration in general are highlighted in the latest official figures from the Department of Education. The number of children speaking English as a second language has risen rapidly t a record high of more than one million. This follows a sharp increase in the number of foreign-born pupils over the past 12 months.

Those who are inclined to support the British Democrats but feel our policy of calling for a total halt to further immigration is too extreme, should read and digest these figures. There is no alternative to our policy unless you are willing to bequeath a white minority Britain to your grandchildren.

In many  parts of London, native English speakers are in a minority, with the proportion as low as a quarter in boroughs such as Tower Hamlets, Newham and Westminster. Across England the number of children who do not have English as their mother tongue has increased by 228,000 since 2008 and now totals 1.1 million.

The proportion tops more than half in the whole of inner London, Luton and Slough. It is higher than a third in 36 other local authority areas, including Manchester, Birmingham, Leicester, Blackburn and Bradford.

The data in the latest report also shows that an extra 250,000 primary school places are needed within the next year, with immigration and subsequent  rising birth rates cited as major causes of the shortage. Some  head teachers have complained that budgets set aside to teach children from immigrant backgrounds have been cut, leaving them struggling to buy in specialist support for pupils.

It won’t take long for voters to realise that the UKIP policy of talking tough on immigration, but refusing to offer real policies to stop it, will do nothing to confront the greatest threat to this nation since June 1940 ( even greater in my view) . We must build up British Democrat branches now so that  we are ready when the time comes, not that time is on our side.

FN Becomes France’s Mass Movement of the White Working Class

Almost ignored by Britain’s media was the French Parliamentary by-election earthquake last month, where Marine Le Pen’s Front National candidate trounced the ruling Socialists in their own bastion of Villeneuve-sur-Lot with 46% of the poll.

An exception to the UK press boycott of this outstanding result was an extensive article by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard published in the Business Section – the only part worth reading – of the Daily Telegraph.

In the article Marine Le Pen gives a valid case on how France should quit the Euro and return to the franc. As the British Democrats should be, she is obviously not an insular nationalist but willing to work with the nation states of Europe, particularly in protecting Europe from colonisation by Afro-Asia. She resolutely attacks high finance and the way corporations profit from wage bartering, playing off wages in the West against cheap labour in Asia. “It is the law of the jungle”, she said.

Evans-Pritchard makes this interesting point: “Nor is she on the UKIP page with her broadsides against Washington and Nato, or her call for France to retake it place as “non-aligned” voice in a multipolar world. It is an anti-Atlanticist patriotism.”

Marine le Pen is a single mother of 44 who is more relaxed about gay rights and abortion than her father Jean-Marie Le Pen. I share his age group (and met him in the sixties) and his cantankerous character and have some sympathy for him when he “deplores her eclectic modernism as an overlay of ‘petit bourgeois’ views picked up in Paris schools.

Nevertheless, her campaign  of ‘image detox’ seems to have worked. As Evans-Pritchard reports: “Only a minority of voters still thinks the Front is a ‘threat to democracy’. Mrs Le Pen is winning over white  working class women in droves. The feminized Front is no longer the party of the angry white male. The softer image is why finance minister Pierre Moscovici describes her as ‘more dangerous than her father’.”

Death of a Parasitic Financial Dealer

Nationalists – and today’s less insular nationalists in particular –  recognise that we need a banking system. That does not mean that we put bankers beyond criticism. But it beggars belief that the old political system, which includes UKIP, can accept without criticism the actions of  the globalist commodities traders, who make no contribution to the welfare of nations or offering a service to the people such as that of a high street bank and who produce nothing throughout their lives beyond personal financial profit.

An example of these parasitic financial dealers was the billionaire Marc Rich, who died last month aged 79 and was buried  in Israel.

Born in Belgium his family fled to New York as refugees  from the Nazis. He eventually began work for the commodity traders Philipp Brothers, now called Phibro. In .1973 after a row over  bonuses he left with a companion called Pincus Green and set up Marc Rich and Co, based in the Swiss town of Zug, attracted by its low tax rates.

The Daily Telegraph Business Section of 27.6.13 reported: “There, they were the first traders to use short-term purchases to make large profits quickly, so giving birth to what is today called the spot market. By buying large volumes when the price was low, they were able to control the market when prices rose, and they are seen as having broken the dominance of the oil giants that had previously controlled the market.”

Some may think the latter achievement was no bad thing.

In 1983 Marc Rich was put on the FBI’s “most wanted” list after he again fled to Switzerland from the U.S. He had traded with Cuba, Iran. South Africa during the apartheid era, Libya, all during U.S. trade embargoes.  He was indicted on more than 50 counts of fraud, racketeering, and evading more than $48m income tax.

For nearly 20 years he managed to keep free from the U.S. authorities. In 1994 in a management buy-out of the company he had formed it was renamed Glencore, with a friend, Ivan Glasenberg, as its chief executive. This year the firm merged with the mining company Xstrata, controlling much of Australia’s vast coal and mineral deposits, marking the biggest deal yet seen in mining.

US President Bill Clinton pardoned him on he last day of his presidency in 2001. Critics pointed to donations by Rich’s ex-wife Denise Eisenberg to the Democratic Party, and the presentation of a golden saxophone to Clinton, renowned for being an amateur saxophonist.