Hate Speech

Bookmark the permalink.

11 Comments

  1. The article ‘Who originated the term racist’ gives a little more detail on where the word originated but agrees it was first penned by Trotsky.

    https://revisedhistory.wordpress.com/2012/10/18/who-originated-the-term-racist-and-why/

  2. ( Party Official ) This word , thank God , is not bandied about as much as it was , as the high tide of Political Correctness has been reached and is now in retreat. The hard left and liberal types are in decline now and with Mass Immigration , the European Union Superstate and much else being discussed , more and more , it is clear that NOW is the time to JOIN BRITAIN’S DECENT NATIONALIST PARTY with a good and respected name .

  3. I think the initial word from Trotsky was ”slavophile”, I am not sure how and when the transition to ”racism” and the branding system of ”racist” came into being. Either way ”racism” seems to be a shape shifting umbrella term which can attach itself to practically anything ‘when need be’, and then vanish on other convenient occasions ie when whites are discriminated against or are victims of verbal abuse or violence.

    ”Racism” also gives license to the media to filter selectively ”news” that reinforces guilt and either ignore or recast that which does not. For example, a man being pushed of a train on the Metro in Paris by football fans who had been shouting ”we’re racists” was featured extensively in the British mass media, for a whole week…and yet any violent attacks and even murders of indigenous whites receives minimal coverage. So the media effectively ”plays God” …

  4. Sticks and stones may break my bones ,but names cannot hurt me. Today our leaders cower at the thought they may be termed racist .
    The Irony that it was coined by a man, part of a group who claim they are chosen of God Who also claimed to be workers in unity. Two men who had hands like women, and never actually worked in any sense as to how it is bandied about , a double irony.
    As I’ve said in the past , call me anything you like other than ‘late for breakfast’.
    Water off a ducks back and honest as well.
    If anyone claims it as offensive, then the business we are in is not for them .

  5. Hey , Patriot, Racist at my age I will take all the compliments I can get !

  6. You are making a grave mistake in pointing out that the Bolsheviks gave birth to anti racism…Although I agree that Trotsky’s juvenile altruism hardly helped…
    Writing in 1924 in a critique of Trotsky’s “Permanent Revolution” Nikolai Bukharin said the following “Comrade Trotsky’s disruptive behaviour at meetings of the central committee reminds me of that of a n***er in a woodpile ! ” I kid you not…Google Bukharin on Permanent Revolution..You can call the Non Trotskyist Bolsheviks including Lenin many things but “anti racist is a vile slander”…All recognised racial inequality as permanent and real but not the main issue in their fight against global capitalism…All put Mother Russia “uber ales” as do Durgin’s National Bolsheviks running the Donetsk Peoples Republic today..To regard the Soviet Union or China today as exporters of anti racism is to confuse their propaganda with their practice…..Lenin was a Nationalist dressed up as an Internationalist to con workers in the West into supporting a doomed ideology,deal with the subject accurately..Politics is a serious business,unlike sectarianism…….

  7. Did “Trotsky” (real name Bronstein) coin the term “racist” (or “racialist”)?

    I read somewhere – I forget where exactly – that ” Ashley Montagu” (real name Israel Ehrenberg) was the first to use. Montagu/Ehrenberg (1905-99) was a leading environmentalist & pseudo-anthropologist who denied the reality of race.

    Suffice is to say that he authored UNESCO’s Statement on Race, and Man’s Most Dangerous Myth: the Fallacy of Race.

    Bronstein or Ehrenberg, what’s the difference? Both were Jews, and both were anti-White.

    JH

  8. The ethologist Konrad Lorenz, in his youth as a German soldier, once likened the
    ”dysgenic population” to the cancerous tumor, ”which destroys the host and then itself.”

    Despite Lorenz declaring himself a ”social democrat” after the war and one year winning the Nobel prize for science alongside fellow ethologist Nikolai Tinbergen, UNESCO widely condemned his most famous work ”On Agression”…

    Occasionally Lorenz had to ‘backpeddle’ in order to prove he was ‘no longer a Nazi’, …this led to the one or two contradictions in his work.

    Although he always maintained that mixing of the cultures does not work, he did -while in ”backpeddling gear” – praise a camp in Switzerland where certain different cultures were brought together(can’t say exactly which cultures), ”let it be imitated on a grand scale”….

    I doubt Konrad Lorenz could have anticipated or comprehended in his wildest nightmares what lay ahead for Europe, and the same of Darwin, who believed the ”higher races will almost certainly eliminate the lower races”(Descent of Man). Darwin was fiercely opposed to slavery yet what he wrote in Descent clearly indicates the different capacities of various races.

    When people say that race ”does not exist” as Ashley Montagu and others did and still do, they should also state that subspecies of many animals species ”do not exist”… but this would make them sound even more ridiculous.

    Take the big cats, they can interbreed, though the offspring is often infertile. As is the mule in the case of the horse and donkey. Mixed race children of Aboriginal and White parentage have been proven to be less fertile and sometimes infertile.

    If all races are the same, is a wolf the same as a jackal or fox, is a lion then, the same as a tiger ? Obviously the latter are from the big cat family, and have many similarities. Yet one is a solitary animal and the other a very social one. One hunts alone and the others together.

    Therefore, subspecies of all types have branched out from their common ancestor, and many of their behaviours differ markedly. Differences in Environment, climate and diet are just some of the factors. Why should this not apply to the human animal ?

    It is the people who define the culture. People of various races define their distinctive cultures. And there are many variations that distinguish them. Therefore, to deny that race has any influence in the evolution of various cultures is to deny that man is an animal in the first place.

    • ( Party Official ) Without going into it , others are more qualified , the discovery of D AND A HAS PROVED THE LEFT AND LIBERAL TYPES TOTALLY WRONG.

      • (Party Official ) I meant to say D.N.A. But none of us missed the point. These Multi Cultural Marxists and liberal types are trying to re write history ! They will be claiming that Alfred the Great , of Wessex , was really West Indian next !

  9. It hardly matters whether Trotsky used the term racist or racialist.The point is he used the term racist as abuse against the majority of Bolsheviks who had a more Nationalistic outlook,arguing that is ideas of permanent revolution worldwide wer wrong since the more backward races would take centuries…Fortunately the problem of Trotsky was removed permanently in 1940 and so none of the problems of mass migration generally afflict the former Communist bloc countries..And when it does,like in Hungary for example,they are quick to do something about it !..I would argue that rather than Neo Liberalism being the bastard child of Communism,it is rather the Church..Communism was not around to corrode Roman civilization,Christianity certainly was !
    We could do the remember the words of comrade Bukharin…..”Christianity,with its ideal of universal love,even extending to one’s enemy,is our greatest adversary”

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *