Half a Billion Pounds Per Year: What Criminal Third World Invaders Cost You Every Year in Prison Fees

British taxpayers pay around half a billion pounds every year to keep convicted criminal Third World invaders in prison in Britain, even though they could all be deported at a fraction of the cost.

The figure, which is probably only the tip of the iceberg, is calculated by taking the established cost of keeping a prisoner in jail of £38,000 per year, and multiplying it by the estimated 10,779 foreign criminals in British prisons, plus the 1,431 who have served their sentences but are still detained “pending deportation arrangements.”

This figure does not include the benefits being paid to a further 4,238 foreign criminals who have completed their prison time and are marked down for deportation—but who are, in government doublespeak, “currently non detained”—in other words, walking the streets free.

The number of foreign criminals was detailed in a secret Home Office report leaked to a daily newspaper.

To make matters worse, the Home Office report revealed, many of the violent Third World criminals who have been freed “pending deportation” have committed a long list of further violent crimes, including three murders, three kidnappings, 14 sexual offences (including rape), 27 other “violent crimes” and 64 thefts.

The Home Office report stated further that the already released Third World invaders have been “set free because there is no reasonable expectation of removal in the short term” and blames the Human Rights Act (HRA) for preventing their deportation.

This is the same law which the Tories promised to repeal as part of their election manifesto.

The huge price being paid to keep these Third World criminals in British prisons makes a mockery of the allegation that it would be “too difficult” or “expensive” to deport them.

Air flights back to Africa and other Third World regions would cost a fraction of the imprisonment costs, and even those could be funded by a seizure of the criminals’ assets in Britain.

The core of the problem is not even the HRA—that is merely a symptom of the liberal disease which, unless rooted out, will see Britain and other First World nations destroyed under a deluge of Third World invaders.

Bookmark the permalink.

4 Comments

  1. I was stupid enough to spend 12 years of my life working in a secure unit with ‘vulnerable’ young criminals.
    .
    One of these was a young man who was dumped in England by his African Aunt. He was put in foster care and he sexually assaulted a girl and it was then discovered that he was HIV positive.
    .
    He was put in the secure unit where I worked where the basic fees were £5,500 per week, (£280,000 pa), plus all the additional costs eg clothing allowances, pocket money, social worker fees solicitors fees and police and court time, escorts, dentist and of course antiretroviral drugs for HIV (£18,000 p/a).
    .

    He was kept there for several years receiving the best treatment British taxpayers money could buy. The kids in this place were the lucky ones who got sent there for ‘treatment’ and because they were deemed vulnerable (as vulnerable as muggers, murderers and sadistic rapists could be). The total expenses incurred by in the care of each of these untreatable personality disordered freaks was astronomical and no expense was spared. The local authority basically gave a blank cheque to these kids.
    .
    Meanwhile, I wonder how much was spent helping the victims of their stabbings, rapes and robberies? I wonder how much they spend on our pensioners? I wonder how much they spend on disabled children?
    .
    .
    These stories you read in the Daily Mail are not extreme ‘one off examples’. They are the norm for anyone who works in the public sector. It is only unusual that these stories come to the public’s attention.

  2. So it costs 38k to keep these foreign crims behind bars, I watched in parliament recently a question asked why don’t we just deport foreign crims instead of jailing them and then maybe deporting them.
    The answer was that they need to be seen to be punished and there was no guarantee that if deported they would be punished.
    Personally, I wouldn’t care, 38k per annum would be far better spent getting our homeless ex military personnel off the streets and into housing.

  3. I see the enormous cost to the British tax payer in keeping these criminals in prison and it makes me think – “What is the cost of 3 yards or so of rope” ?? It must surely be less than keeping these scum in the lap of luxury for a few years, before releasing them to commit the same crime again.

  4. As diversity is a strength why don’t we import another 10,000 Third World criminals to give ourselves that extra edge on our European neighbours?

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *