EU Human Rights Chiefs have sent a list of demands to the UK Government asking that the UK media must not report when terrorists are Muslim.
The report from the Council of Europe’s human rights watchdog, blamed the recent increase in hate crimes and racism in the UK on the ‘worrying examples of intolerance and hate speech in the newspapers, online and even among politicians’.
The report included 23 suggestions urging the UK Government to reform criminal law and freedom of the press and in a brutal criticism of the British press, the report recommends ministers ‘give more rigorous training’ to journalists.
Reports suggest that UK ministers firmly rebutted the remarkable demands, telling the body: ‘The Government is committed to a free and open press and does not interfere with what the press does and does not publish, as long as the press abides by the law.’
The report, from the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) body, said there had been an increase in hate speech and racist violence in Britain between March 2009 and March 2016 and recommends the British media be barred from reporting the Muslim background of terrorists.
The 83-page report states: ‘ECRI considers that, in light of the fact that Muslims are increasingly under the spotlight as a result of recent ISIS-related terrorist acts around the world, fuelling prejudice against Muslims shows a reckless disregard, not only for the dignity of the great majority of Muslims in the United Kingdom, but also for their safety.
‘In this context, it draws attention to a recent study by Teeside University suggesting that where the media stress the Muslim background of perpetrators of terrorist acts, and devote significant coverage to it, the violent backlash against Muslims is likely to be greater than in cases where the perpetrators’ motivation is downplayed or rejected in favour of alternative explanations.’
This attempt by the Commissioner for Human Rights to censor the British media shows what Brussels will stoop to in order to achieve their hidden agendas and begs a number of questions.
- Has the Commissioner tried to censor the media in other EU countries?
- Have other EU countries complied with the Commissioners directive?
- Is the BBC already compliant?
Views Today : 329
Total views : 285099
Who's Online : 8
6
Freedom to know the news is fast approaching the same nadir as freedom of speech , which long ago was taken away by our servants cum masters. Taken away in a blink of ones eye.
Now anything remotely offensive to the elites, ( encompasses mostly everything) is regarded as hate speech.
We are now also regarded as mushrooms as well, kept in the dark and fed manure. Still we did vote out of this monstrous EUSSR. so Mrs May should tell them to mind their own.
So come on all you mushrooms. become poison ones. Kick these filth out.
My only surprise is that the usually cowardly British government did not acquiesce to the demands of the ECRI without question.
With ploys such as this, and a judge ruling that in certain cases involving race, ‘the truth is no defence’, one wonders in how many other instances we are being lied to, manipulated and deceived without our knowledge, to prop up the rotten decaying establishment, and the multi-racial utopia which is being forced upon us.
BRITAIN AWAKE!
Many moons ago John Tyndall and John Morse received a 12 month prison term for telling and publishing the truth, That the vast majority of street crime was then of Afro Caribbean in nature and fact. Today who knows ,with so many eastern Europeans here, they may have been pushed down the pecking order.
Then later, the Metropolitan Police Chief, one Paul Condon claimed 80% of all street crime was by blacks . Was he prosecuted, I fear not.
So the moral of this, is the truth is no defence, only to a discriminated few. The law discriminates, but only at the behest of a few, we call the elites. Our laws , the laws fought and won at great sacrifice by the common man. stolen and used by powerful elites.. Just as it was before John was forces to sign the ‘magna charter’. Perhaps the common man now needs to remind these judges, that they are servants of the Law. Our Laws.
The EU has brought all these problems upon Europe, and is now trying to gag native Europeans from telling the truth about terrorists. In other words exposing the EU failure. So you won’t be allowed to say if they are a Muslim, and next you won’t be able to describe the race of other violent criminals either. I think Hungary has given a clear message to the EU, they will not take any more of their quotas over migrants. The rest of Europe must sooner or later follow their example.
The ”Council of Europe’s human rights watchdog” are concerned about an increase in ”hate crime”, ”hate speech” and ”intolerance” – Presumably the unanimous silence of the various media outlets over the grooming scandals and other ”politically sensitive” issues is the way they like it.
Come to think of it the British media already does its best not to reveal the identity of certain terrorists. I seem to remember recently one was described as a person with mental health issues and another was described as being a Swedish national, before it subsequently emerged they were both members of the ‘Peaceful Religion’.
Just a PS
For many years here in Britain the ethnicity or name and description of certain criminals is not released, when in fact a clear description might help the public and police to catch said criminals .
So over time we are now in a position to immediately surmise, that said criminals are in fact non white, and or foreign. in every case,
Its also said ‘ not all Muslims are terrorist . but all terrorist are Muslim’ So in fact telling countries tied into this EUSSR to, not declare what is obvious, to the world and his wife, is really quite infantile.
Well said Baz. The savage attack in Russell Square which left one woman dead and others injured was committed by a Muslim. The horrific murder of the Finnish academic Jeroen Ensink in North London was committed by a Nigerian ”student”…who is now detained indefinitely for ”manslaughter” on the grounds of diminished responsibility.
In both cases the media has focused solely on mental health issues…however, as black males are SEVENTEEN times more likely to be diagnosed with a mental illness than whites, is it not the case that psychosis and /or personality disorders are so rife within black populations that it is pretty much the ”norm” for them. Speak to someone who has worked in a psychiatric hospital.
Not far from where Mr Ensink was attacked while he was posting cards celebrating the recent birth of his now fatherless child, white teenager Alan Cartwright was murdered while riding his bicycle in Caledonian road, by a second or third generation Black youth, the media focused on ”street crime” …
No mention of diversity anywhere.
The Council of Europe represents 47 European countries including the 28 members of the EU but it does not belong to Brussels. Multiracialism and press distortion started in 1948 with the British Nationality Act and was reinforced by various Acts of Parliament long before we joined the old Common Market in 1973. When we leave the EU we will still belong to the European Council, Nato, and the United Nations. There is no reason to think that a British government would ever defend the rights of the British people. They love cheap labour.