by John Shaw
We nationalists have pointed out for years that the EU Super state actually restricts members ability to trade and is a very complicated trade protection organisation that in the end is bad for all involved.
Chris Philp, a remain voting Conservative MP has now, like most others, realised this and in a major speech has said that Britain will soon be free to forge FREE TRADE agreements with countries such as China and India because our country will be out of the ‘EU Protectionist Racket’!
Given that the USA, Japan, China India and many other large trading countries are all using World Trading Organisation (WTO) rules and coming on fine without being told what to do by Germany and France, I hope our party and indeed the country, just go down that route without delay.
Should the EU, led by France and Germany try to extract leaving money then we could have a deep and meaningful discussion with the Germans about repatriation money for the second world war that was not paid! as for France, we saved them from Germany twice and they never paid us anything for all our dead servicemen and civilians and the loss of our EMPIRE!
8
the problem with joining the WTO is by leaving the EU We are replacing EU Bureaucracy then singing up to more Foreign Meddling We should have no part in any American funded organisations
We should not be joining the WTO another foreign meddle club
John Shaw ( Party Official ) As always I know what you mean , Adam. A REAL NATIONALIST INDEED ! However , it is all to do with making it possible to do business abroad. Risky from a getting paid point of view ! The firms get paid because the trade organisation GUARANTEES IT and establishes order regarding import tax and indeed permission to import .
The first two countries approached by Theresa’s trade brokers, India and China, have indicated that we would need to take more of their students and workers. The WTO is not an independent body it is dominated by the United States. We would simply be exchanging one set or rules for another, and restricting European immigration but increasing the influx of non-Europeans. Brexit is a populist confidence trick by dedicated Atlanticists.
No we must not agree to such a deal from two Mongrel Countries
John Shaw ( Party Official ) Having had a look at W.T.O. RULES , I can assure you that there is NOT ANY E.U. Superstate like stuff regarding free movement of peoples , or anything else , NASTY AND INTEREFERING LIKE IT ! I suppose ANYTHING WOULD BE BETTER THAN BEING IN THE SUFFOCATING EUROPEAN UNION !
It’s about trying to scaremonger the remaining EU countries into never leaving.
I’m afraid that there are a few flaws in this John Shaw article. First of all, there is nothing wrong with a Country adopting protectionists measures in order to save its indigenous industries from competition from cheap labour economies such as China just to cite one example.
Indeed, I cannot see why a nationalists British party would seek to trade with China and other similar counties at all,
Under a nationalist dispensation, all the manufactured goods that we currently obtain from overseas would be made in British factories by British workers.
Our only imports would consist of necessary raw materials and food produce that we are incapable of producing ourselves. These would be paid for by exporting manufactured goods from the new industries that we would create.
Where would the money come from to pay for all this? There is absolutely no problem regarding monetary creation providing it is spent on GDP transactions (no inflation).
I also disagree with your comments regarding Germany. Don’t forget that it was we who declared war on Germany and NOT the other way round!
John Shaw ( Party Official ) Nice to hear from you again , solutrean . As always , promoting Nationalism in our Country is a very tough call. Knowing your long standing support for the cause , we would welcome all positive contributions from you.
John Shaw ( Party Official ) I note that the Leave Means Leave campaign has said that we can walk away from the E.U. Superstate ‘ Divorce ‘ negotiations at any time and REVERT TO WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION RULES. This is the point I made in the above article. We do not have to trade with anyone that we don’t want to be involved with. People should bear in mind that the latest E.U. THREATS amount to a request for a 92 BILLION POUND ‘ Divorce ‘ settlement from Britain !
I agree with Salutrean on the issue of “reparations” from Germany. However you raise a valid point. Britain bankrupted itself fighting a war to liberate France, Holland, Poland etc from NAZI occupation. Britain didn’t have to go to war – it could have minded its own business and traded with the NAZIS like the Americans (at first). Instead we went to war and bankrupted ourselves fighting that war. My point being that not one of the countries we helped to liberate has ever offered to repay their share of our expenditure on their behalf. If, indeed, the UK does owe the EU BILLIONS then, clearly, many EU countries can take that sum off the TRILLIONS they owe us. At risk of being accused of stating the obvious France, Poland, Belgium etc owe us far more than we could ever possibly owe them. High time these countries stepped up to the plate and made good on their debt of honour.
never again must We get into a War that is none of our Business
leave Nato and set up an independent foreign policy free of the USA though Trump is very pro-British canzuk.co.uk
John Shaw , It occurs to me that as we Import far more than we Export , a W.T.O. 10% TERRIF ON EVERYTHING COMMING IN AND GOING OUT , would be financially very PROFITABLE. This situation would then fit in neatly with our Nationalist economic and social thinking , as we would have encouraged ourselves to make and grow more.
With headlines on the biased and blatently misleading MSN saying ” it is beginning to look like NO BREXIT ” due to the Labour Party finally showing their true colours and scotching BREXIT , things are not looking good. The notion that we should pay any money to the Superstate is wrong. I feel we should leave now , by JOINING THE WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION and then just GET ON WITH BEING AN INDEPENDENT COUNTRY.
The Labour Party tactic of suggesting an INTEREM PERIOD of several years that would mean FREE MOVEMENT would continue , IS DISGUSTING. This would cause a MASSIVE FLOOD OF PEOPLE , ARRIVING WHILST THEY STILL CAN ! Ten Million People trying to ‘ beat the deadline ‘ , is a DISTINCT POSSIBILITY. The Conservatives , particularly the Remain ones , are actually forcing their own EXTINCTION as the NEWCOMERS WILL ALL VOTE LABOUR.
Labour is not fit for purpose time for the Party to wake up the students who were conned by Corbyn